<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rotating circles after Duchamp Man Ray Picabia</title>
	<link>http://pixelist.info/2008/03/25/rotating-circles-after-duchamp-man-ray-picabia/</link>
	<description>The Pixelist</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: pixelpusher :: pixel performance and art : Blog Archive : offset circles take two</title>
		<link>http://pixelist.info/2008/03/25/rotating-circles-after-duchamp-man-ray-picabia/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>pixelpusher :: pixel performance and art : Blog Archive : offset circles take two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pixelist.info/2008/03/25/rotating-circles-after-duchamp-man-ray-picabia/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] been playing with the offsetcircles patch from before, and came up with a whole bunch of nice results. Taking a page from Claude, I made the drawing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] been playing with the offsetcircles patch from before, and came up with a whole bunch of nice results. Taking a page from Claude, I made the drawing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
